Moorfox
Moorfox, compared honestly
Side-by-side comparisons with the RMM tools you might choose instead. Each page states where the other product is ahead, in plain words, because a comparison that always ends in our favour would tell you nothing. Moorfox has no macOS agent, no PSA, and patches third-party applications only as far as winget reaches, and every page below says so.
The three answers that settle most shortlists
Before any feature matrix, most teams are decided by three things: which operating systems have to be covered, whether ticketing and billing come from the same vendor, and whether the price is published or negotiated. Those are the rows below. A tick is full support, an approximate sign is partial, a cross is none, and a dot marks a fact rather than a verdict.
| Product | Operating systems | Ticketing and PSA | Pricing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moorfox | ≈ Windows and Linux; no macOS agent yet | ✗ None, and none planned: Moorfox stays an RMM | • Published: free for 10 devices, then $2 per device per month |
| NinjaOne | ✓ Windows, macOS, Linux, plus MDM for mobile | ✓ Own ticketing product plus PSA integrations | • Quote-based, per device; no published price list |
| Atera | ≈ Windows and macOS agents; Linux support is thinner | ✓ Full PSA built in: ticketing, time tracking, billing | • Published per-technician pricing with unlimited devices |
| Datto RMM | ✓ Windows, macOS and Linux agents | ✓ Pairs with Autotask PSA and the Kaseya stack | • Quote-based annual contracts negotiated with sales |
| Syncro | ≈ Windows and macOS; little to no Linux coverage | ✓ Full PSA built in: ticketing, invoicing, payments | • Published per-user pricing |
| Tactical RMM | ≈ Windows first; Linux and macOS agents with fewer features | ✗ None; integrations community-built | • Free to self-host; sponsorship for signed agents; your own server costs |
| Action1 | ✓ Windows, macOS and Linux agents | ✗ None; integrations available | • Free for the first 200 endpoints, then per-endpoint subscription |
| Level | ✓ Windows, macOS and Linux | ✗ None; integrations available | • Published per-device monthly pricing |
Where each one beats Moorfox
The single strongest reason to pick the other product, taken from the top of each comparison page. If one of these describes your estate, the honest answer is that the other tool is the better buy.
- NinjaOne: Patch management is the reason many teams buy NinjaOne, and it is deeper there: mature third-party application patching across a large catalogue, where Moorfox leans on winget and covers what winget knows about.
- Atera: PSA and RMM in one subscription: tickets, time and billing next to the machines they concern.
- Datto RMM: Multi-tenant MSP features, and tight pairing with Autotask, IT Glue and the rest of the Kaseya stack.
- Syncro: PSA, RMM and invoicing in one product on one per-user price, which suits a small MSP's economics.
- Tactical RMM: Your data never leaves your server, which some clients and regulators simply require.
- Action1: Patch deployment is the product's entire reason to exist, and it shows: a curated third-party application catalogue against Moorfox's best-effort winget, and a longer track record than a feature we shipped this year.
- Level: Patching covers macOS and a wider set of third-party applications than winget reaches.
What Moorfox does not do at all
Three gaps worth knowing before you read any further. There is no macOS agent, so a fleet with Macs in it needs something else alongside or instead. There is no PSA: no ticketing, no time tracking, no invoicing, so an MSP consolidating onto one vendor is not the target. Third-party application patching reaches as far as winget knows about, which is not the same as a curated patch catalogue. None of that is on a roadmap you can hold us to today.
Every comparison
Moorfox vs NinjaOne
NinjaOne is an established endpoint-management platform aimed at MSPs and internal IT, best known for patch management across Windows, macOS and Linux and for a broad ecosystem of integrations.
Moorfox vs Atera
Atera is an all-in-one RMM and PSA with published per-technician pricing and unlimited devices, aimed at MSPs and IT departments that want ticketing, billing and endpoint management in one subscription.
Moorfox vs Datto RMM
Datto RMM is a Kaseya-owned, MSP-focused RMM with mature patching, ransomware detection and a component store, usually sold alongside Autotask PSA and the wider Kaseya ecosystem on negotiated annual contracts.
Moorfox vs Syncro
Syncro is a combined PSA and RMM with published per-user pricing, popular with small MSPs that want ticketing, invoicing and endpoint management in one subscription, with Splashtop bundled for remote access.
Moorfox vs Tactical RMM
Tactical RMM is a self-hosted, source-available RMM with a strong scripting culture and MeshCentral providing remote access.
Moorfox vs Action1
Action1 is a cloud platform built around patch management first, with RMM features alongside: browser-based remote desktop, scripting and reporting.
Moorfox vs Level
Level is a modern, lightweight RMM with published per-device pricing, native low-latency remote access and automation across Windows, macOS and Linux.